<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Should a Business Respond to a Social Media Attack on its Brand?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sethsimonds.com/business-response-to-social-media-attack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sethsimonds.com/business-response-to-social-media-attack/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:20:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 2009 Customer Service Winners And Losers: AT&#38;T, United and Minted &#124; How To Create Markets With Technology</title>
		<link>http://sethsimonds.com/business-response-to-social-media-attack/#comment-3742</link>
		<dc:creator>2009 Customer Service Winners And Losers: AT&#38;T, United and Minted &#124; How To Create Markets With Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 20:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sethsimonds.com/?p=1758#comment-3742</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve had very memorable (both good and bad) with my service providers and I am going to give you a quick run down of what happened and what I did to get better customer service from them.  In some cases it was successful and in some others it wasn&#8217;t. I will look at AT&amp;T, United and Minted. I recommend you look at the United story for things you can do. This is beyond social media. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve had very memorable (both good and bad) with my service providers and I am going to give you a quick run down of what happened and what I did to get better customer service from them.  In some cases it was successful and in some others it wasn&#8217;t. I will look at AT&amp;T, United and Minted. I recommend you look at the United story for things you can do. This is beyond social media. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg</title>
		<link>http://sethsimonds.com/business-response-to-social-media-attack/#comment-3410</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 05:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sethsimonds.com/?p=1758#comment-3410</guid>
		<description>I have to admit, I never considered the viewpoint you presented on this topic.  

I agree with you that there is potential for abuse in social networking.  The problem I have with this article that the topic of &quot;Why did the video succeed?&quot; has not been addressed in depth.

I&#039;ve made many videos for a few websites, and only one of them went viral.  Even then, it&#039;s only at about 50,000 views in a period of one year.  It&#039;s not like anyone can make an attack online it will automatically explode online.

Did Dave do the video for promotion?  Of course he did, music videos are one of the most effective forms of promotion online for a band.  Was there issues that he may or may not have brought up?  Probably.  Do I know that they broke his guitar? No.  So legally, they are correct in stating that they are not liable.  From that angle it looks like United were treated unfairly, but I believe that United had acted inappropriately as well.

The reason why the video became successful and that I believe it is that people can relate to it, and it takes a frustrating ordeal and brings humor to it.  I know many people who travel frequently; stories of poor customer service is often mentioned in the same breath as United.  

United should have been proactive rather than reactive when it comes to policy.

I suppose I should answer your main question of the article though as it is a good one.

I think companies should respond by improving their reputation by using social media proactively instead of reactively.  Voltswagon&#039;s &quot;The Fun Theory&quot; is a perfect example of how social media can promote a business, they&#039;ve improved their online presence without showing a single picture of their product.  If anyone had a complaint about voltswagon&#039;s customer service, it would be in a medium in which voltswagon already has presence in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit, I never considered the viewpoint you presented on this topic.  </p>
<p>I agree with you that there is potential for abuse in social networking.  The problem I have with this article that the topic of &#8220;Why did the video succeed?&#8221; has not been addressed in depth.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve made many videos for a few websites, and only one of them went viral.  Even then, it&#8217;s only at about 50,000 views in a period of one year.  It&#8217;s not like anyone can make an attack online it will automatically explode online.</p>
<p>Did Dave do the video for promotion?  Of course he did, music videos are one of the most effective forms of promotion online for a band.  Was there issues that he may or may not have brought up?  Probably.  Do I know that they broke his guitar? No.  So legally, they are correct in stating that they are not liable.  From that angle it looks like United were treated unfairly, but I believe that United had acted inappropriately as well.</p>
<p>The reason why the video became successful and that I believe it is that people can relate to it, and it takes a frustrating ordeal and brings humor to it.  I know many people who travel frequently; stories of poor customer service is often mentioned in the same breath as United.  </p>
<p>United should have been proactive rather than reactive when it comes to policy.</p>
<p>I suppose I should answer your main question of the article though as it is a good one.</p>
<p>I think companies should respond by improving their reputation by using social media proactively instead of reactively.  Voltswagon&#8217;s &#8220;The Fun Theory&#8221; is a perfect example of how social media can promote a business, they&#8217;ve improved their online presence without showing a single picture of their product.  If anyone had a complaint about voltswagon&#8217;s customer service, it would be in a medium in which voltswagon already has presence in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The New @UnitedAirlines&#160;&#124;&#160;seth simonds</title>
		<link>http://sethsimonds.com/business-response-to-social-media-attack/#comment-3248</link>
		<dc:creator>The New @UnitedAirlines&#160;&#124;&#160;seth simonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sethsimonds.com/?p=1758#comment-3248</guid>
		<description>[...] been 3 months since United Airlines was dragged into social media. There are hundreds of social media sites a big brand could use to connect with customers. Twitter, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been 3 months since United Airlines was dragged into social media. There are hundreds of social media sites a big brand could use to connect with customers. Twitter, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Should a Business Respond to a Social Media Attack on its Brand? &#124; SMF - Social Media Consultant</title>
		<link>http://sethsimonds.com/business-response-to-social-media-attack/#comment-3096</link>
		<dc:creator>How Should a Business Respond to a Social Media Attack on its Brand? &#124; SMF - Social Media Consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sethsimonds.com/?p=1758#comment-3096</guid>
		<description>[...] via How Should a Business Respond to a Social Media Attack on its Brand?  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via How Should a Business Respond to a Social Media Attack on its Brand?  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gill Wagner</title>
		<link>http://sethsimonds.com/business-response-to-social-media-attack/#comment-2211</link>
		<dc:creator>Gill Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sethsimonds.com/?p=1758#comment-2211</guid>
		<description>Just posted about the Commerce Case.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;See: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/dFhsb&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/dFhsb&lt;/a&gt; (The suit is out there in PDF format at the bottom of the post.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just posted about the Commerce Case.</p>
<p>See: <a href="http://bit.ly/dFhsb" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dFhsb</a> (The suit is out there in PDF format at the bottom of the post.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sethsimonds</title>
		<link>http://sethsimonds.com/business-response-to-social-media-attack/#comment-2202</link>
		<dc:creator>sethsimonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sethsimonds.com/?p=1758#comment-2202</guid>
		<description>1. Agreed. &lt;br&gt;2. Absolutely. &lt;br&gt;3. United comes out very well if they find a way to improve customer service. Carroll? Probably not. Youtube is famous for giving people 14minutes of fame. The last minute never comes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Agreed. <br />2. Absolutely. <br />3. United comes out very well if they find a way to improve customer service. Carroll? Probably not. Youtube is famous for giving people 14minutes of fame. The last minute never comes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sethsimonds</title>
		<link>http://sethsimonds.com/business-response-to-social-media-attack/#comment-2201</link>
		<dc:creator>sethsimonds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sethsimonds.com/?p=1758#comment-2201</guid>
		<description>Well put! I don&#039;t think I &quot;toned down my attacks on dave carroll&quot; so much as it became obvious that a few illustrious readers were getting caught up in the example instead of the general question of the post. I tried to steer the conversation back to the original question. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, how sad is it that we&#039;re actually discussing the need for large corporations to develop robust customer service policies that respect the customer first and foremost? Sometimes the basics seem so very far away. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The fact that there was a breakdown in communication on United&#039;s part is enough for a savvy manager to make the call and fix the guitar. Not sure why that didn&#039;t happen. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put! I don&#39;t think I &#8220;toned down my attacks on dave carroll&#8221; so much as it became obvious that a few illustrious readers were getting caught up in the example instead of the general question of the post. I tried to steer the conversation back to the original question. </p>
<p>That said, how sad is it that we&#39;re actually discussing the need for large corporations to develop robust customer service policies that respect the customer first and foremost? Sometimes the basics seem so very far away. </p>
<p>The fact that there was a breakdown in communication on United&#39;s part is enough for a savvy manager to make the call and fix the guitar. Not sure why that didn&#39;t happen. </p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name</title>
		<link>http://sethsimonds.com/business-response-to-social-media-attack/#comment-2178</link>
		<dc:creator>Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sethsimonds.com/?p=1758#comment-2178</guid>
		<description>I love how  you (and most companies) immediately conclude that a complaining customer is out to defraud the company.  I recommend you read the complete story on Dave&#039;s website.  The reason this song is so popular is because it rings true and wholly plausible based on a shared public  experience with baggage mishandling and pass-the-buck customer service.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Companies need to risk honoring a fraudulent claim once in a while in order to avoid inadvertently denying a legitimate one.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At any rate, &quot;high grade whining&quot; in social media is a perfectly legitimate response to high-grade anti-consumer practices.  When the official customer disservice channels are geared to deny claims and suspect all claimants as criminals, the consumer has to take their claims through other venues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how  you (and most companies) immediately conclude that a complaining customer is out to defraud the company.  I recommend you read the complete story on Dave&#39;s website.  The reason this song is so popular is because it rings true and wholly plausible based on a shared public  experience with baggage mishandling and pass-the-buck customer service.</p>
<p>Companies need to risk honoring a fraudulent claim once in a while in order to avoid inadvertently denying a legitimate one.  </p>
<p>At any rate, &#8220;high grade whining&#8221; in social media is a perfectly legitimate response to high-grade anti-consumer practices.  When the official customer disservice channels are geared to deny claims and suspect all claimants as criminals, the consumer has to take their claims through other venues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://sethsimonds.com/business-response-to-social-media-attack/#comment-2177</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 04:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sethsimonds.com/?p=1758#comment-2177</guid>
		<description>1. Carroll should have checked his guitar immediately, especially if it was worth $3,000 and he had been pre-concerned.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2. United should have dealt with the complaint better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3. No-one comes out of this well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Carroll should have checked his guitar immediately, especially if it was worth $3,000 and he had been pre-concerned.</p>
<p>2. United should have dealt with the complaint better.</p>
<p>3. No-one comes out of this well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://sethsimonds.com/business-response-to-social-media-attack/#comment-2173</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sethsimonds.com/?p=1758#comment-2173</guid>
		<description>Seth, he does that and the cynics (I&#039;m looking at YOU, Seth) will suspect/accuse him of fabricating the whole thing for his personal gain to get word out on his music.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1.  His other music is online, where it&#039;s been for months.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2.  He&#039;s stated repeatedly that he&#039;s ALREADY written United 2, but hasn&#039;t written 3.  When Song 2 comes out, expect people to say, &quot;Oh come on, you&#039;ve made your point, stop milking it.&quot;  But maybe this guy is exactly what he says he is.  He promised 3 songs, he&#039;s writing three songs.  He says 1 and 2 were written and had been performed live before the videos were made, they were.  He was given the runaround months ago, he says he&#039;s done being angry with United, sure seems that way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;United (and many others) keep thinking about this thing in dollars and cents.  I don&#039;t think this guy can be bought.  I think the service he got was crap and THAT&#039;s what he&#039;s decrying.  That&#039;s also why it strikes a chord.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s also why United is so overmatched in the credibility department.  This guy has a response online which actually addresses the cynics in us.  You can say the &quot;Hey, don&#039;t be mean to Ms. Irlweg&quot; thing is a &quot;masterstroke of PR&quot; if that&#039;s the way you see the world, but if anyone does, I&#039;m sad for them.  I think he said it because it came out of him instinctually because he&#039;s a nice guy.  That&#039;s what&#039;s striking a chord with so many people and that&#039;s why United is screwed, because they have zero intention of changing their corporate culture.  They have a PR problem and they want to pay money and make it go away.  The longer this unfolds the more it&#039;s clear how United (and let&#039;s be fair, this could be any number of corporations) has really lost its way on customer service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth, he does that and the cynics (I&#39;m looking at YOU, Seth) will suspect/accuse him of fabricating the whole thing for his personal gain to get word out on his music.</p>
<p>1.  His other music is online, where it&#39;s been for months.</p>
<p>2.  He&#39;s stated repeatedly that he&#39;s ALREADY written United 2, but hasn&#39;t written 3.  When Song 2 comes out, expect people to say, &#8220;Oh come on, you&#39;ve made your point, stop milking it.&#8221;  But maybe this guy is exactly what he says he is.  He promised 3 songs, he&#39;s writing three songs.  He says 1 and 2 were written and had been performed live before the videos were made, they were.  He was given the runaround months ago, he says he&#39;s done being angry with United, sure seems that way.</p>
<p>United (and many others) keep thinking about this thing in dollars and cents.  I don&#39;t think this guy can be bought.  I think the service he got was crap and THAT&#39;s what he&#39;s decrying.  That&#39;s also why it strikes a chord.</p>
<p>It&#39;s also why United is so overmatched in the credibility department.  This guy has a response online which actually addresses the cynics in us.  You can say the &#8220;Hey, don&#39;t be mean to Ms. Irlweg&#8221; thing is a &#8220;masterstroke of PR&#8221; if that&#39;s the way you see the world, but if anyone does, I&#39;m sad for them.  I think he said it because it came out of him instinctually because he&#39;s a nice guy.  That&#39;s what&#39;s striking a chord with so many people and that&#39;s why United is screwed, because they have zero intention of changing their corporate culture.  They have a PR problem and they want to pay money and make it go away.  The longer this unfolds the more it&#39;s clear how United (and let&#39;s be fair, this could be any number of corporations) has really lost its way on customer service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
